Inaugural online book | Application Concepting Series No. 1



100 Ideas for Envisioning Powerful, Engaging, and Productive User Experiences in Knowledge Work

Download E-Book or Order Softcover Book



In addition to this website, Working through Screens
is available in several other formats:

- Softcover print on demand books
- Free letter size .pdf
- Free large format .pdf
- Free "Idea Cards" .pdf

View all Working through Screens Formats

Contact Our Consulting Studio

info@FlashbulbInteraction.com
206.280.3135

View Jacob Burghardt's profile on LinkedIn

Studio Updates

From our FlashbulbUX Twitter feed:
  •  
Follow FlashbulbUX on Twitter



Feedback on Working through Screens?

Email us your thoughts or Twitter @FlashbulbUX

Application Envisioning idea
I4.
Uncertain or Missing Content



Adopting computing tools into knowledge work practice can create new ambiguities around stored data, as well as aggravate any ambiguities that were already inherent in information collections. Product teams can envision functionality concepts that could support workers as they identify, evaluate, and act on uncertain and missing content.






Examples from three knowledge work domains:
(Illustrated above) A scientist is reviewing a visualization of a large clinical results set in her analysis application. She notices a visual distinction that seems to be indicating missing data for one subject, prompting her to view the particular subject’s data table in order to make a determination of what, if anything, has gone wrong.

A financial trader views a historical pricing graph of a particular security in his trading application. Several intervals of the graph are flagged to show where the pricing information is unreliable due to too much variability between the three different pricing feeds that his firm uses.

An architect opens a project in her building modeling application only to find that part of the 3D model has been programmatically colored red to show conflicting changes from different members of her team. A contextual message states that the segment is critically uncertain and requires resolution before any further modifications can be made.
Content stored in interactive applications may present knowledge workers with a variety of surprises and problems. Large data sets can develop holes and distortions over time that workers must recognize and understand in order to act effectively. Colleagues may unexpectedly and drastically modify the characteristics of one or more interaction objects (B6, C7, G4, H4). Individual objects or entire repositories of data can be merged with like content, often with surprising results. Automations can programmatically generate garbled outputs after “choking” on small input abnormalities (E3, E4, E5).

Product teams can attempt to identify these types of scenarios in their concepts for work mediation (A). After identifying cases that are both probable and potentially damaging, teams can then envision functionality concepts that could provide workers with appropriate visibility into potential issues (F10) and clear pathways to subsequent action (C4).

When product teams do not actively consider approaches for promoting graceful handling of uncertain or missing content in their application concepts, resulting tools may promote certain types of errors (C9, G3) and lead to less beneficial work outcomes (L1). When users recognize the existence of key content problems but are not provided with tailored functional support, they may have difficulty determining how to proceed (D2, D3, K7).

Conversely, uncertain or missing content is a characteristic part of some knowledge work endeavors. In these cases, the diversity of scenarios (A6, A7, A8) may be too high for teams to envision systematic responses, and users may find any such responses to be distracting and unnecessarily limiting (A9, D4, C8).

See also: B1, B5, D6, G6, H, I, K12




Application Envisioning questions:

Where might holes, conflicts, and unknowns appear in the data sets that your team’s application concepts have been envisioned to import, reference, or generate? What specialized symbologies and interactive options could help targeted knowledge workers to recognize and then valuably correct — or appropriately act around — these unstable information situations?

More specific questions for product teams to consider:
What types of anomalous information do targeted individuals currently encounter in the work practices that your team is striving to mediate?

How serious are these situations? What errors and collaborative problems can result?

How frequent are different cases of uncertain or missing information? Are they rare exceptions or a common part of what it means to accomplish the work that your team is targeting?

How do knowledge workers currently handle uncertain and missing content in their computing tools? What attitudes do they have about these anomalies in their information environments?

Where in your team’s envisioned application concepts might anomalous data negatively impact work practices? How likely and damaging are these cases?

What larger design and technology trends could valuably inform your ideation around relevant solutions for uncertain and missing content?

What automated checks might your product conduct in order to determine the presence or absence of anomalous data?

What symbology and visual cues could communicate the existence of uncertain or missing content in your application’s displays? What information representations and messaging could help targeted workers to effectively recognize, understand, evaluate and work through these issues?

What interaction options could be presented in conjunction with flagged data in order to allow workers to take appropriate, or even mandated, next steps?

How might your team’s sketched responses for anomalous data situations relate to larger error prevention and handling conventions in your application concepts?

Do you have enough information to usefully answer these and other envisioning questions? What additional research, problem space models, and design concepting could valuably inform your team’s application envisioning efforts?


< PREVIOUS PAGE  |  NEXT PAGE >



Back to top  |  View Table of Contents

All original contents of Working through Screens online book are subject to
the creative commons license (Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) unless otherwise noted.
Please attribute the work to “Jacob Burghardt / FLASHBULB INTERACTION Consultancy.”